Defense Strategies Rolfe Uses in the "Nuremburg Trials"

In the opening argument, Hans Rolfe, the defense attorney, states that, A judge does non hold the laws, he carries out the laws of his country. end-to-end the trial, what strategies does he use to consist these laws in an attempt to demean the criminal prosecutions plate? Hans Rolfe, the defense attorney, uses cumulate strategies to defend the laws the judges on trial carried out in order to discredit the prosecutions case. runner of all, in Rolfes cross interrogatory of Rudolph Peterson he attempts to collection the sterilisation of the control was not a fight abomination. Similarly, Rolfe attempts to discredit the witness, Irene Hoffman, by trying to delegate that the consequence of that previous trial was legitimate. Finally, later Jannings testimony, Rolfe attempts to shift Jannings guilt to the world. During Rudolph Petersons testimony, Hans Rolfe, tries to show that the verdict carried out by the judges several come along ago was not a war crime. At the resembling time, the prosecution claimed that the order for Peterson to be sterilize was a war crime because he was singled out because of his governmental affiliations. After spirit finished the case, however, Rolfe thought of a government agency to show that this was not a war crime and Peterson was not singled out.

He asked the witness a question from the previous case: to form a disapprobation using a some simple abandoned words. When Peterson was inefficient to create the sentence, Rolfe told the judges that the witness beget had a psychic disorder, implying that this was believably passed down to her son. A German law, as easy as a law of Virginia, allowed for the sterilisation of the mentally incompetent. Rolfe express that the judges ending to sterilize the witness had nonentity to do with existence a political opponent of the Nazi... If you fatality to get a upright essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper