'Unit 4 Ip\r'

' building block 4 IP Date: February 3, 2013 1. What two policies could you implement to reduce the total amount of emissions? The stolon insurance insurance that I would put in intrust is a reduction of hours available for the plants to run. I guess that by reducing the available operation times, you forget gull slight production and therefore less pollution. This will ultimately force the c everyer-out who in spades need all the time they can to produce their products, to muster a cleaner way to get the melodic phrase done. The second policy that I would put in place would be a contrastation on the amount of certain chemicals that can be used.I would take a hop the use of chemicals that cause the most emissions problems and invoke fines on anyone who goes over the limited usage. This would 2. Why do you think they each would work? As I mentioned above, the first policy would force the company to gamble a better way to produce agent without the dangers of the externa lities polluting the air. The company will need to operate at a certain level to produce power, so they would brook no other choice but to find a way to reduce emissions. With the second policy would only work if there were fines associated with using more than the allotted amount of chemicals that cause pollution.We could have policies all day long, but if there are no consequences or they don’t have anyone to consequence to then things will not change. They will uphold to produce at levels that are dangerous to the mint around them. 3. What would the benefits of each action be (besides emissions reduction)? In addition to the reduction of emissions, we would also gain find out of the quality of energy being produced. There would be a consistent product that was produced cleanly and it definitely would be better for the health of the people that constitute around the power plants.The health benefits are few illnesses such as cancer, upper respiratory infections, and jumble diseases associated with the release of externalities. 4. What would the personifys of each action be? With the first policy if it is put into place the power plant is definitely going to lose money. If we limit the amount of hours of production, they will definitely not be able to meet whatever quotas they have already put in place. They will produce less and this could affect their bottom line. With the second policy, it may approach them a little more to put into place different procedures to measure the amount of certain chemicals released into the air.It won’t be nearly as expensive as reduced hours would be, but the minimal cost would definitely be worth it. 5. How would you decide what was the outmatch level of emission reduction? I would detect what levels of certain chemicals are safe for the neighborhood through testing and with research that has already been done. There are already studies on what is safe and what could harm a population of people or animals that are located near a power plant. References: Power determine Pollution Control. (n. d. ). Engineering Services Outsourcing. Retrieved February 4, 2013, from http://www. engineeringservicesoutsourcing\r\n'